Skip to content

docs: Clarify TypeScript 0.3.4 compatibility and SSH outcomes - #33

Merged
abruption merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/ts-0-3-4-guidance
Oct 12, 2026
Merged

abruption merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/ts-0-3-4-guidance

Conversation

@abruption

@abruption abruption commented Oct 12, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Closes #32

Summary

  • Add the explicitly reviewed public runtime 0.3.4 legacy/successor matrix row and fixed-source publication evidence.
  • Update the TS setup and canonical instructions to recognize reviewed runtimes 0.3.3 and 0.3.4. Retain the historical 0.3.3 pure-validator rejection of a supplied 0.3.4 identity and explain why the actual published 0.3.4 guard differs.
  • Explain Windows PowerShell SSH native exit-code forwarding, retaining complete validated submission evidence after abnormal transport exits, and uncertain partial/malformed output without automatic resend.
  • Preserve exact-version endpoints, existing package-manager ownership, separate skill updates and submission != consumption/ACK.
  • Keep TS frontmatter byte-identical: skill 0.2.0 / minimum 0.1.0 / full 0.3.2 / typescript / probe-help. Python canonical bytes and README locales are unchanged.
  • Keep this work separate from Python PR docs: 외부 메시지와 Reply-To 신뢰 경계 명확화 #30 and future TS 0.4.0 planning issue docs: Prepare TypeScript 0.4.0 handoff guidance and staged compatibility rollout #31.

Evidence

  • Public 0.3.4 release, npm registry latest=0.3.4, and exact source afed4a5a8945012faf1b23d52cffecb70470a5b3 were checked.
  • The 0.3.3..0.3.4 guard source change explicitly adds only the reviewed 0.3.4 row; it does not introduce wildcard acceptance. Public CLI/SSH response source was also read.
  • Artifact hashes/provenance in the compatibility document are attributed to the respective publication records. This documentation task did not independently install the npm runtime artifact or run live SSH/agent ACK qualification.

Validation

  • node scripts/validate-skill.mjs: PASS, including metadata and local-link checks.
  • skill-creator quick_validate.py session-peer-ts: PASS using a temporary venv with PyYAML 6.0.3.
  • node scripts/test-ts-skill.mjs: PASS, isolated project/global installation, source replacement, listing and removal; Python fixture preserved.
  • git diff --check: PASS.
  • Exact comparisons against origin/main: TS frontmatter and Python canonical skill unchanged; only the three listed TS files changed.
  • Work split between a bounded Codex subagent and primary Codex; the primary reviewed the diff and finite-matrix source change. No external Claude Code/Antigravity CLI was used for this release-guidance task.
  • Current head cfbe95f5579bcdd38f15074c2263bcf0b58ec136: CI 2/2 PASS (skill-package / validate, GitGuardian). Automatic code/security review completed on the same head with no reported findings or inline comments; previous-head checks are not reused.

Scope and release boundary

Documentation only: session-peer-ts/SKILL.md, docs/typescript.md, docs/typescript-compatibility.md.
No merge, tag, release, npm publication, user-installed skill/runtime update, Python snapshot edit or operations change.
Existing immutable session-peer-ts-v0.2.0 artifacts and adoption pins remain unchanged. These edited instructions are a documentation candidate, not replacement release bytes or approval to finalize/publish a new skill/profile version.

Branch: docs/ts-0-3-4-guidance
Head: cfbe95f5579bcdd38f15074c2263bcf0b58ec136
Candidate TS SKILL SHA-256: 7cf706a0ec59da4f6c91054aeb599efd3be2aa90073dd1e91804aaca83e71de5

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 12, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-12T05:33:02.572649Z cfbe95f PR opened
🔒 Security Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-12T05:33:06.602465Z cfbe95f PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Clarify TypeScript 0.3.4 skill compatibility and Windows SSH outcomes

1 participant