-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 138
[WIP] Agent #3050
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[WIP] Agent #3050
Conversation
gherrit-pr-id: Gd55zt5pongyj3bujlmvo7grlayqh26b4
Summary of ChangesHello @joshlf, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request significantly refactors the parsing and attribute handling mechanisms within the Hermes tool. It introduces a new generic Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a significant and well-executed refactoring of the Hermes annotation parsing logic. The introduction of the HermesDecorated struct provides a more unified and cleaner representation for parsed items. The change to require an explicit hermes tag in the doc block info string is a good improvement for parsing robustness. The codebase is more maintainable as a result of these changes. I have one suggestion regarding some fields marked with #[allow(dead_code)] that could be cleaned up for better clarity.
| #[allow(dead_code)] // TODO: Remove if truly unused | ||
| lean_block: String, | ||
| #[allow(dead_code)] | ||
| source_file: Option<PathBuf>, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The fields lean_block and source_file are marked with #[allow(dead_code)], and the accompanying TODO for lean_block suggests they might be unused. A review of the call sites in scanner.rs confirms that these fields are not used in the main application logic after being populated, although lean_block is used in tests within this file.
lean_block: This field contains the extracted Lean code, which is central to Hermes's purpose. If it's intended to be used later, the#[allow(dead_code)]should be removed. If not, and the code is extracted by a later stage, this field should be removed to avoid confusion.source_file: This seems redundant, as the file path information is already captured in theNamedSourceused for error reporting.
To improve maintainability, it would be best to either integrate these fields into the application logic or remove them if they are indeed redundant.
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## Gr5hnlfzgkxvo5cdwir7s5hxfhlji6xjd #3050 +/- ##
==================================================================
Coverage 91.87% 91.87%
==================================================================
Files 20 20
Lines 6057 6057
==================================================================
Hits 5565 5565
Misses 492 492 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
Squashed into #3051 |
This PR is on branch hermes.
#[cfg_attr(..., path = "...")]#3045unsaferedaction #3034mod foo;declarations #3008Latest Update: v3 — Compare vs v2
📚 Full Patch History
Links show the diff between the row version and the column version.
⬇️ Download this PR
Branch
git fetch origin refs/heads/Gd55zt5pongyj3bujlmvo7grlayqh26b4 && git checkout -b pr-Gd55zt5pongyj3bujlmvo7grlayqh26b4 FETCH_HEADCheckout
git fetch origin refs/heads/Gd55zt5pongyj3bujlmvo7grlayqh26b4 && git checkout FETCH_HEADCherry Pick
git fetch origin refs/heads/Gd55zt5pongyj3bujlmvo7grlayqh26b4 && git cherry-pick FETCH_HEADPull
Stacked PRs enabled by GHerrit.